4 ms·
The alternative answer is that Instagram has no patents, and nobody is talking about it, so there's no search results to return for that. And as far as I can t
by mdwrigh2 15y ago
The alternative answer is that Instagram has no patents, and nobody is talking about it, so there's no search results to return for that.
And as far as I can tell, Instagram didn't have any patents. A quick Google Patent Search doesn't turn anything up with their name in it either [1].
[1]: https://www.google.com/search?q=instagram&tbm=pts https://www.google.com/search?q=instagram&tbm=pts
- moultano 15y agoOne UI thing we've struggled with is how to tell the user that we don't think there are any good results for the query. It's a very difficult thing to evaluate effectively, because most of our notions of a good search result page (obviously) involve there being results on it. But it seems intuitively that there's a big value to quickly and reliably concluding "nope nothing" and moving on. It's a problem exacerbated by the increasing size of our index. It's hard to quickly tell whether you've reached the noise floor of the internet yet.
- pwf 15y agoThat's the conclusion I came to, but it wasn't very definitive. At the very least I expected to come across links to people talking about their lack of patents. Maybe I should have searched for 'instagram no patents'.