3 ms·
I appreciate the work that went into slimming this binary down, but it's a ~negligble amount of work compared to llama.cpp itself. HN is inundated with posts d
by FL33TW00D 3y ago
I appreciate the work that went into slimming this binary down, but it's a ~negligble amount of work compared to llama.cpp itself.
HN is inundated with posts doing xyz on top of the x.cpp community. Whilst I appreciate it is exciting - I wish more people would explore the low-level themselves! We can be much more creative in this new playground.
- spiderfarmer 3y agoWhy not both.
- meiraleal 3y ago> We can be much more creative in this new playground. You are not being creative gatekeeping, this behavior is quite old.
- hluska 3y ago[flagged]
- FL33TW00D 3y agoThis isn't directed at the author of this post. I was just referring to the plethora of thin x.cpp wrappers.
- animuchan 3y agoJust to add a different POV, this didn't register as an "insult" or "idiotic take" at all for me. If a project amounts to basically running another project's binary and displaying the results, it's fair criticism to point that out, is it not?
- meiraleal 3y ago> Just to add a different POV, this didn't register as an "insult" or "idiotic take" at all for me. Just to clarify. Are you the author?
- rgbrgb 3y agoIsn’t doing Stuff on top of it what it’s for? llama.cpp is explicitly highly portable systems code with bindings in many languages.