>Making fun of dominant religions, that are in no danger of being wiped out because people find them ridiculous, is fine. Making fun of any religion is fine. N

>Making fun of dominant religions, that are in no danger of being wiped out because people find them ridiculous, is fine. Making fun of any religion is fine. No religion is above reproach, no religion is beyond mockery. None of them. >Making fun of marginalized religions Here's a newspeak term. There is no such thing as a "marginalized religion". This is a fictitious concept. >which are already frequently ridiculed because they're different from what the dominant culture does, and which are under threat, either overall or within a given area, is a very different matter. Good, every religion should be ridiculed. There's no culture that's beyond ridicule. You're trying to create an illogical concept where hatred of White people is a reasonable thing. You can't come straight out and say it, so you launder the idea through a luxury belief and magically the hatred is tolerable. >The problem with cultural appropriation is specifically that it exacerbates marginalization and discrimination against already-marginalized groups. No it doesn't, because "cultural appropriation" doesn't exist. Upholding cultures even if they're backwards because it's politically fruitful breeds resentment. This is "baizou" behavior.