3 ms·
I read "or post" to include comments. Regardless, it is a violation of the principle, if not the rule and degrades civil discourse.
by WillPostForFood 3y ago
I read "or post" to include comments. Regardless, it is a violation of the principle, if not the rule and degrades civil discourse.
- pvg 3y agoIt doesn't include comments since that makes little sense and this isn't about 'civil discourse' in the abstract but about known failure modes of this specific forum. Don't dingleberrypick stuff out of articles to start unrelated flamery. People are right to downvote this sort of thing and to point out it's corrosive enough to merit written rule.
- WillPostForFood 3y agoYou should include comments, because it is definitely a known failure mode as well.
- pvg 3y agoI don't 'include' stuff, I'm some rando. But if you check the guidelines, it's in there just not in the 'you can't respond to a thing in a comment' way which would make conversation impossible.