4 ms·
I agree on a number of these points, but: > No immediate way to paginate image search. Out of curiosity, why do you want it paginated? This isn't a criticism,
by mdwrigh2 15y ago
I agree on a number of these points, but:
> No immediate way to paginate image search.
Out of curiosity, why do you want it paginated? This isn't a criticism, I'm merely curious.
> Dropping links to cache: text_only: and similar: pages.
Cache and Similar still exist, granted they're more difficult to find now.
> Dropping scholar from the drop-down menu
While I don't really mind they dropped scholar (scholar<Tab> in chrome works well enough when I need it to), I do wish they'd let us customize the top bar.
> Closing down labs. (Much of the fun in the brand is gone with it).
Eh, I'll agree with Larry on this one. When it died, I wasn't affected at all. I honestly can't think of a single thing that I used on it and, from what I hear. it was largely a collection of projects that were hardly even being maintained any more.
> Almost blindly copying Bing regardless of whether the changes are perceived as useful or not.
Besides a similar looking image search, what else do you think they've copied?
- codesuela 15y ago>Cache and Similar still exist, granted they're more difficult to find now. Cache is now tightly integrated into Chrome and I think more heavily used then before (ie by a larger audience) because now if you pull up a website that's offline Chrome will point you to the cached copy
- guelo 15y agoSo they made the feature easier to use on their browser but harder to use on other browsers? Seems slightly evil to me.
- wahnfrieden 15y agoYou can just click or hover the preview "arrows" (which look like >> to the right of a search result on hover) and the "Cached" link appears. Not evil in any way.