2 ms·
>You start from 1 empty set though. Sez who, zigactly? If you are coldtea, I am coldertea. As in, I love my tea colder than you do yours. And starts who? Not m
by fuzztester 3y ago
>You start from 1 empty set though.
Sez who, zigactly? If you are coldtea, I am coldertea. As in, I love my tea colder than you do yours. And starts who? Not me.
Don't kid around, dude. I dik around.
>If you could start from 0 empty sets, you'd have a point.
What if the set of empty sets has no element? :)
- coldtea 3y agoWas the first comment under the influence of drugs? In any case, for the second comment: even if the set of empty sets has no elements, it's still ONE set.
- fuzztester 3y ago>Was the first comment under the influence of drugs? No, it was not. Regarding this whole subthread in which I participated, I did it for some mutual logic-chopping fun. But if you thought there was a chance it was, you shouldn't have replied to the second comment, because I would have been equally under the influence of the drugs for the second, if I had been so for the first comment. (Don't reply to a druggie.) After all, they were both done in one atomic comment transaction.