2 ms·

At this point it's better to look for specific people rather than a single source. Some suggestions Gary Marcus https://garymarcus.substack.com/ https://garym

At this point it's better to look for specific people rather than a single source. Some suggestions Gary Marcus https://garymarcus.substack.com/ https://garymarcus.substack.com/ Temnit Gebru and Dr. Emily Bender https://www.dair-institute.org/ https://www.dair-institute.org/ Alex Hanna, Mystery AI Hype Theater: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2126417 https://www.buzzsprout.com/2126417 Dr. Émile P. Torres: https://www.xriskology.com/ https://www.xriskology.com/

latenightcoding 3y ago
Gary Marcus covers Gary Marcus
LewisVerstappen 3y ago
lol all the sources you linked have consistently been wrong at prredictions over the last 2 years
- croes 3y ago
  If they are constantly wrong they are a good source. Just take the opposite
  - bigfudge 3y ago
    The opposite of a wrong prediction is not necessarily true. It depends on the form of the statement.
jatins 3y ago
What makes Gary Marcus a "Leading expert on AI" (in his own words)?
caesil 3y ago
These sources all fall for a very different kind of AI hype.
comeonbro 3y ago
Hilarious answer
tomalaci 3y ago
Missing Elon Musk, guy is a leading authority on all things AI that even the British government asks what to do about it from him (big /s).
- throwaway4good 3y ago
  And the podcast guy that speaks really slowly ...