4 ms·

That’s simply incorrect. Edit: my source for this is that I have been involved with hundreds of data breaches where the EU was satisfied that the privacy contr

• JohnFen 3y ago
  What part of what I said was incorrect? Your source doesn't make the case that I was incorrect about any of my assertions. That doesn't mean I'm right, of course, but I don't see how examples of privacy controls successfully protecting data disproves them. There can still be cases where the controls failed.
  • c0pium 3y ago
    > What part of what I said was incorrect? All parts of it. You are asserting that a sufficiently skilled attacker can magically overcome all privacy controls. This fundamentally misunderstands how privacy controls work. Don’t make absolute statements, they’re always incorrect (see what I did there?). When data is compliantly anonymized, the ability to deanonymize it has been irrevocably destroyed. When evaluating privacy controls, you evaluate them against a trusted insider with full access and unlimited time. There are lots of organizations whose controls meet this bar.