True. Just because someone uses some else research to push a bad narrative doesn't mean the initial research is bad. But in this case it fairly certainly is. E

True. Just because someone uses some else research to push a bad narrative doesn't mean the initial research is bad. But in this case it fairly certainly is. Either by lack of scientific rigor, if not worse. Doesn't make much sense from an archeological standpoint, and there are concerns from the geological standpoint too it seems: Ex: https://www.reddit.com/r/geology/comments/17t81dg/question_regarding_geological_claims_in_recent/ https://www.reddit.com/r/geology/comments/17t81dg/question_r...