3 ms·
You don’t even have to go to a casino. I personally wouldn’t look at a poker night with friends as being much different than getting together to play a board ga
by criddell 3y ago
You don’t even have to go to a casino. I personally wouldn’t look at a poker night with friends as being much different than getting together to play a board game.
- crazygringo 3y agoIt's different though. Poker with friends, you can only ever win as much as your friends put in, which usually isn't going to be that much. You're right -- it feels closer to a board game. But at a casino, there's no similar limit to how much you can win. It feels like your dreams could literally come true in Las Vegas, that you could come back home and buy a new house. Poker with buddies doesn't include that possibility.
- criddell 3y agoPoker with buddies is still gambling though and it’s a lot of fun. Maybe more fun than casino gambling (depending on your friend group). I wonder if the GP thinks people who have a Thursday night game with friends are low class as well?
- crazygringo 3y agoOh for sure -- I'll take poker with buddies over a casino any night of the week. It's funny, for whatever reason I don't mentally put "poker with friends" in the category of "gambling". I mean obviously it technically is -- no argument there -- but when I think of "gambling" I think of "potentially dangerous/addictive", and (hopefully) poker with friends isn't. I'm also curious what GP thinks about whether poker with buddies is "lower class", or if it's only a casino thing. (Or gambling dens? Backroom tables?)
- zeroonetwothree 3y agoI find games for money really unfun, even if it's for small stakes. It just makes it too much about winning rather than having a good time.