3 ms·
Well, yes and no. I don’t mean to single out C++, I actually do appreciate the language, but it is far more difficult to evolve than most languages. For instanc
by SubjectToChange 3y ago
Well, yes and no. I don’t mean to single out C++, I actually do appreciate the language, but it is far more difficult to evolve than most languages. For instance, languages like Java/.NET/Python/etc have a far more “defined” place in the world of software, and they can optimize their languages around their niche. With C++ you have businesses that don’t really care about performance, but they have 50+ million lines of code they rely on, embedded folks, HPC/GPGPU, graphics/AV, CAD/CAM/CAE, application programmers, and people responsible for providing support for customers for all of those domains. It’s extraordinary difficult to propose anything that doesn’t step on someone’s toes.
- pjmlp 3y agoSure, yet the complexity depth is quite similar, regarding the amount of ecosytem and programming stack knowledge that doesn't fit on the brain, after 30 years of programming language history.