3 ms·
Nope, because all the carbon production until that point can be unwound. The shitty uncomfortable life that the "use less" camp wants me to live, cannot.
by mrshadowgoose 3y ago
Nope, because all the carbon production until that point can be unwound.
The shitty uncomfortable life that the "use less" camp wants me to live, cannot.
- benj111 3y agoBut currently we aren't on a course to actually unwind that carbon production in time. It's like saying there's an oasis 2 days walk from here, so don't worry about having a shower and possibly using all your drinkable water. You still need to save enough water to actually get to the oasis, and at the moment, we're kinda sorta having a conversation about whose job it is to actually make the trek, so in reality it's going to be at least another day before everyone decides that they need to start marching, and as we only currently have 2.5 days of drinking water. That shower is really irresponsible.
- pjc50 3y ago"can be" is very far from "is going to be" and even further from "is going to be paid for". Also, we have a lot of solar energy .. during the day. The storage/transmission problem is solvable but not solved.
- adrianN 3y agoWho’s gonna pay for the unwinding though?