3 ms·
Then we should also question those laws. I don’t buy the „it’s for your protection“ argument anymore.
by phero_cnstrcts 3y ago
Then we should also question those laws. I don’t buy the „it’s for your protection“ argument anymore.
- c0pium 3y agoFatalities and collisions are both down significantly in places with those kinds of laws, and there are some interesting natural experiments created by exceptions which strongly indicate those links are causal. Just because a law has a side effect you don’t like doesn’t mean the Illuminati are out to get you.
- _zamorano_ 3y agoFor many people is either I buy something I can afford, or I don't buy anything. What is safest. Regulating new cars to expensive safety standards, and make them unaffordable for the masses or being more conservative about such standards and allow affordable cars to exist? European govermentes have chosen the first option. In the meantime, the car average age keep increasing. Much safer, indeed. The end goal is to have much less cars on the road, not conspiracy, but an actual statement. And of course, the cars to get rid of are not those of the wealthy.