3 ms·
There are fundamental genetic differences between men and women, which determine differences in our brain structure, therefore behaviour. The study is not pseud
by xcv123 3y ago
There are fundamental genetic differences between men and women, which determine differences in our brain structure, therefore behaviour. The study is not pseudoscience. Social constructivism is an anti-scientific perspective.
Even if the behavioural differences between men and women were purely socially determined, the study would still be scientific, in that it investigates and measures one of those differences.
If you believe there are zero behavioural differences between men and women on average (whether genetic or socially determined) then you are completely lost.
- hotdogscout 3y agoI don't think polls are precise enough to be used as a measuring tool in science. If you replicate the measurements and get different results, how can that be? Aren't you failing to account for all other variable parameters when investigating the phenomenon?
- xcv123 3y agoParticipants were selected from a university. This is statistics. Polls have a margin of error.
- hotdogscout 3y agoWhich is a flawed use of math because margin of error expectations are based on an empirical rule based on a random variable and answers to a poll are not random. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/68%E2%80%9395%E2%80%9399.7_rule https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/68%E2%80%9395%E2%80%9399.7_r...
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- xcv123 3y agoThe study may not be perfect according to your impeccable standards, but it is not entirely scientifically worthless either.