3 ms·
This is, bluntly, dumb. The only way you can justify having UBI be below poverty is if you don’t accept any of the philosophy or studies of how UBI actually wor
by moomin 3y ago
This is, bluntly, dumb. The only way you can justify having UBI be below poverty is if you don’t accept any of the philosophy or studies of how UBI actually works and stick with the long-since disproven approach of “let people starve”.
Geo-politically, you can’t outcompete China to the bottom, stop trying. And stop incentivising firms to drive their employees into poverty.
- 6510 3y agoIt would probably be a good transitional tool. We can start with 50 per month, it is enough to do the organization of it and end that part of the debate (both real and imagined) When in place it is really easy to increase it to 100, 250 etc