> First, taking a simple and intuitive view, we can see a dialogue agent as role-playing a single character2,3. Second, taking a more nuanced view, we can see

> First, taking a simple and intuitive view, we can see a dialogue agent as role-playing a single character2,3. Second, taking a more nuanced view, we can see a dialogue agent as a superposition of simulacra within a multiverse of possible character Roleplaying is such a perfect term of LLMs. They are basically LARPers. Another term I like for an LLM conversation is "Improv." Their "knowledge" is applied with the explicit goal of continuing the conversation, including making up convincing nonsense up on the spot and rolling with it, just like a good improv actor.