3 ms·
I’m surprised you are able to get a whole script working as expected out of it. I’ve tried using chatgpt just for lines of code alone and its always coming up w
by kjkjadksj 3y ago
I’m surprised you are able to get a whole script working as expected out of it. I’ve tried using chatgpt just for lines of code alone and its always coming up with a solution thats, I guess you could say is far to “creative” to be useful and often doesn’t end up doing what I expect of it when I go to test what its given me.
- orochimaaru 3y agoI had a very specific ask. I gave it the uri as comma separated values and asked for the swagger spec. There wasn’t scope for creativity. I could also split the uri by service names. That helped parallelize my questions. It wasn’t just dump the data in. There was some cleanup behind the scenes that I had to do.
- AussieWog93 3y agoGPT-4 or GPT-3.5? They're completely different products.
- marginalia_nu 3y agoWe need to stop propagating this nonsense. GPT-4 still messes up.
- danielbln 3y agoOP said they're different products, which is very true. Yes, GPT-4 still makes mistakes, but it's leagues ahead of 3.5.
- johnfn 3y agoIt's not nonsense at all. The degree to which GPT-4 messes up is dramatically lower than 3.5.
- marginalia_nu 3y agoThe nonsense is the automatic conclusion that when ChatGPT messes up, it must be 3.x; which is demonstrably false.
- johnfn 3y agoBut no one said that. GP just said they were different products. And that is true. It is meaningless to show an error that GPT 3.5 produced in a conversation about 4. They are separate products.