3 ms·
Watermarking is useless in a world where (F)OSS or unregulated LLMs are as good as regulated ones. Cryptography could prove that media was captured by a certa
by smt88 3y ago
Watermarking is useless in a world where (F)OSS or unregulated LLMs are as good as regulated ones.
Cryptography could prove that media was captured by a certain person at a certain time, but the general public doesn't have the time to decide whom to trust. Many Americans still share Russian state media as though it's reliable news.
- jruohonen 3y ago> Watermarking is useless in a world where (F)OSS or unregulated LLMs are as good as regulated ones. But wouldn't watermarking work for identifying and maintaining the integrity with respect to the source of images and videos? Note, though, that you can't watermark plain ASCII. > Cryptography could prove that media was captured by a certain person at a certain time, but the general public doesn't have the time to decide whom to trust. I agree; trust is the real issue.
- hackerlight 3y ago> Watermarking is useless in a world where (F)OSS or unregulated LLMs are as good as regulated ones. But they're less accessible. So it's a partial solution even if it isn't a complete solution.