Thanks for clearing that up. It's very unfair when prosecutors refuse to prosecute and you are the victim. The burden of justice is transfered then to the victi

Thanks for clearing that up. It's very unfair when prosecutors refuse to prosecute and you are the victim. The burden of justice is transfered then to the victim to run a campaign against the DA and at best he loses an election, the original wrong is still not righted! It should fall upon a jury or grand jury to reject an indictment. Short of that, the victim must be allowed to present evidence of a crime before a judge, where the prosecutor has refused to prosecure. if there is merit the why shouldn't there be a prosecution? At least for crimes where there is an actual victim. This idea that financial compensation is enough is ludicrous.