4 ms·
Twitter is in a similar situation, and according to compete data (inaccurate i know but vaguely indicative), twitter has more than 100 times more traffic, and t
by zerostar07 15y ago
Twitter is in a similar situation, and according to compete data (inaccurate i know but vaguely indicative), twitter has more than 100 times more traffic, and they had ~70 servers in 2009 (http://www.quora.com/How-many-servers-does-Twitter-have http://www.quora.com/How-many-servers-does-Twitter-have). Just curious here.
- iusable 15y agoI completely agree with your take on it; but pls note the entirely different problem Instagram solved vs. Twitter. If you build a real-time streaming application for pure text based objects, your stack will look very different. But collecting, storing, replicating and serving images as your primary social object != same thing. Hence, even when Twitter 'added' photos, they went with Photobucket so as to not change the nature of their stack. It had taken them 3 years to really get ahead of their adoption curve for 'just' text.