3 ms·
> We're talking about the Apple that is trialing a 7" tablet, right? The one that talked up "4 cores" at the 3rd generation unveiling? Same Apple? I may be bia
by gurkendoktor 15y ago
> We're talking about the Apple that is trialing a 7" tablet, right? The one that talked up "4 cores" at the 3rd generation unveiling? Same Apple?
I may be biased here, because I visit apple.com frequently but I never bother with the announcement videos. I don't care about Apple's market metrics, and I didn't care about quad-core.
As far as websites go, apple.com/ipad shows me lots of useful stuff. Safari has a reader mode and a read-later list. There are great apps on the store, for education and whatnot. iBooks can do this and that. Everythings syncs and gets backed up.
And this is already their most technical release in a long time, the first two iPads were heavily marketed by simply showing apps.
The first Google result for Toshiba tablet's is http://www.thetoshibatablet.com/ http://www.thetoshibatablet.com/. It only mentions hardware, except for stating that it runs Android 3.1, without any explanation of course.
That is why these spec announcements get ridiculed all the time. If either company were to ship their devices with genuinely awesome bonus apps, ones that Apple hasn't nailed yet, I doubt anyone would point their finger at them and laugh.
- gurkendoktor 15y agoOh, one example comes to mind: The Kindle Fire was not interesting at all as far as specs are considered, but it sounded like a great idea to many Apple fans because it had a better-curated App Store and the full Amazon experience.
- MaysonL 15y agoAnd most importantly, a $200 price tag...
- bookwormAT 15y agoI agree that the toshiba website is aweful. But It's not as if everyone but Apple is just talking feature besides talking about hardware specifications. For example, here is Samsung's page for the Galaxy Tab 10.1: http://www.samsung.com/global/microsite/galaxytab/10.1/feature.html http://www.samsung.com/global/microsite/galaxytab/10.1/featu...