4 ms·

> Anybody who says 'I need you to...' goes on the list, even if they are not actually talking to me myself. Can you say more about this? I use this phrase (or

by NiloCK 3y ago

> Anybody who says 'I need you to...' goes on the list, even if they are not actually talking to me myself. Can you say more about this? I use this phrase (or slight variations) all the time in both work and personal contexts. I had no idea it could be abrasive.

mathgeek 3y ago
Not the GP, but I read it as they prefer to be told the reason in addition to the request.
somewhereoutth 3y ago
It implies that the recipient should be pandering to your 'needs'. Better to say that it is the thing that has 'needs' - e.g. 'the rubbish needs to be taken out [before the dustbin people get here]'
- Shaanie 3y ago
  Those are different, though. Your statement leaves ambiguity as to who will tend to the objects' needs. Sometimes the implication that you are the one expected to do it is clear, but far from always. People on the spectrum will probably struggle with that type of ambiguity too, which is worth keeping in mind.
deberon 3y ago
Not sure how abrasive this would actually be in a boss v employee scenario. However, hearing people order food this way makes me cringe.
anymouse123456 3y ago
Yeah, I also stiffen under, "I want you to..." In those cases I strongly prefer to use and hear, "Will you please..." There's something in it that feels like I don't exist. It's just an announcement of what the King or Queen wants. I'm not worthy of consideration in the request.
- TylerE 3y ago
  "Will you please" makes me think of a parent telling their kid to stop kicking the back of the seat in front of them. That's like the MOST passive aggressive phrasing.
  - kubanczyk 3y ago
    Why is everyone using "passive aggressive" these days when they really mean "irritated"? The parents in your example situation couldn't be really accused (even implicitly) of being aggressive and they are definitely not passive. And there's nothing wrong with being irritated. The phrase used to mean responses like "I wonder why some people act like moronic pieces of shit about others' seats". See how it's non-direct but aggressive at the same time?
    - TylerE 3y ago
      It's passive aggressive because it's a passive statement that carries a strong threat of negative reaction if it isn't followed.
      - kubanczyk 3y ago
        Something like "will you please stop kicking the seat" carries a strong threat relative to which other variant? It's more passive than which other variant? Or do you claim that it's a passive voice grammar-wise? (It isn't.)
  - anymouse123456 3y ago
    Of course it depends on the tone, the context, and the request itself. When I'm asking someone to do something, I almost always want to know if that request is a stupid thing to do right then. So, "Will you please" implies my intent. If you don't think it's the right thing, then let me know and I'll almost always be persuaded by the new information. If the reason is, "I don't feel like it." that's one kind of conversation, but the more common response is, "I'm right in the middle of xyz, can we do this tomorrow?", or even "I'm not sure we should do that at all because, x, y and z." The answer is almost always, "Of course, thanks for letting me know." All that said, a "Will you please" when you really mean, "Do this shit right now, or else!" is one of the most infuriating things people do and I've left an otherwise great relationship in large part because that nonsense was constant.

by NiloCK 3y ago

mathgeek 3y ago

Not the GP, but I read it as they prefer to be told the reason in addition to the request.

somewhereoutth 3y ago

It implies that the recipient should be pandering to your 'needs'. Better to say that it is the thing that has 'needs' - e.g. 'the rubbish needs to be taken out [before the dustbin people get here]'

Shaanie 3y ago
Those are different, though. Your statement leaves ambiguity as to who will tend to the objects' needs. Sometimes the implication that you are the one expected to do it is clear, but far from always. People on the spectrum will probably struggle with that type of ambiguity too, which is worth keeping in mind.

deberon 3y ago

Not sure how abrasive this would actually be in a boss v employee scenario. However, hearing people order food this way makes me cringe.

anymouse123456 3y ago

Yeah, I also stiffen under, "I want you to..." In those cases I strongly prefer to use and hear, "Will you please..." There's something in it that feels like I don't exist. It's just an announcement of what the King or Queen wants. I'm not worthy of consideration in the request.

TylerE 3y ago
"Will you please" makes me think of a parent telling their kid to stop kicking the back of the seat in front of them. That's like the MOST passive aggressive phrasing.
- kubanczyk 3y ago
  Why is everyone using "passive aggressive" these days when they really mean "irritated"? The parents in your example situation couldn't be really accused (even implicitly) of being aggressive and they are definitely not passive. And there's nothing wrong with being irritated. The phrase used to mean responses like "I wonder why some people act like moronic pieces of shit about others' seats". See how it's non-direct but aggressive at the same time?
  - TylerE 3y ago
    It's passive aggressive because it's a passive statement that carries a strong threat of negative reaction if it isn't followed.
    - kubanczyk 3y ago
      Something like "will you please stop kicking the seat" carries a strong threat relative to which other variant? It's more passive than which other variant? Or do you claim that it's a passive voice grammar-wise? (It isn't.)
- anymouse123456 3y ago
  Of course it depends on the tone, the context, and the request itself. When I'm asking someone to do something, I almost always want to know if that request is a stupid thing to do right then. So, "Will you please" implies my intent. If you don't think it's the right thing, then let me know and I'll almost always be persuaded by the new information. If the reason is, "I don't feel like it." that's one kind of conversation, but the more common response is, "I'm right in the middle of xyz, can we do this tomorrow?", or even "I'm not sure we should do that at all because, x, y and z." The answer is almost always, "Of course, thanks for letting me know." All that said, a "Will you please" when you really mean, "Do this shit right now, or else!" is one of the most infuriating things people do and I've left an otherwise great relationship in large part because that nonsense was constant.