11 ms·
> But it is good enough to replace stack overflow. For the kind of things I‘m using stackoverflow for I prefer it. It‘s much fast to google and scan the sf pa
by quonn 3y ago
> But it is good enough to replace stack overflow.
For the kind of things I‘m using stackoverflow for I prefer it. It‘s much fast to google and scan the sf page than to wait for GPT to type out an answer and read that.
GPT is only useful if the code needs to be adapted, and I rarely use stackoverflow for that.
- fy20 3y agoI'd suggest you try Copilot, specifically Copilot Chat. I was skeptical about it as ChatGPT feels like it had a lot of issues with code, but I tried it yesterday to build a small game (I do web APIs for my dayjob, so I have zero experience in that) and it honestly feels game changing, It's like you have a mid-level developer sitting next to you, who has been using the libraries you are using for years. It still hallucinates, and it still makes mistakes, but many questions I would have turned to Google to, it was able to answer right there and explain exactly why my code was not right. Also surprisingly good at figuring out logic issues, I always get confused if X and Y are up/down or left/right.