3 ms·
I love that the article states it "would have required a giant antenna covering two-fifths of the state of Wisconsin... was never implemented because of protest
by Avshalom 3y ago
I love that the article states it "would have required a giant antenna covering two-fifths of the state of Wisconsin... was never implemented because of protests and potential environmental impact"
Yeah, i'm sure it was those damned hippies not the wild impracticality of covering half of wisconsin.
- lvass 3y agoThat's just the area formed by the grid of underground cables.
- ahmedfromtunis 3y agoThey don't have to actually cover that much space; not even close. It is actually possible to emulate an arbitrarily giant antenna using an array of antennas.
- pyinstallwoes 3y agoHow is that so?
- VHRanger 3y agoWhat are we using Wisconsin for right now anyway
- rapjr9 3y agoMaking sausage, cheese, beer, and heavy machinery.