> That's survivor's bias. You can be ignorant about anything until it becomes a problem. I choose to believe that if you could name a branch of physics that ca

> That's survivor's bias. You can be ignorant about anything until it becomes a problem. I choose to believe that if you could name a branch of physics that can't be done without philosophy, you would have named it. Therefore, I take your comment to mean that you can't name a branch of physics that can't be done without philosophy. That's consistent with the possibility that no such branch exists. Put another way, philosophy is utterly useless for physics, which is something I wrote elsewhere in this thread