6 ms·
Is this the same DOJ going after SpaceX for the opposite?
by superduty 3y ago
Is this the same DOJ going after SpaceX for the opposite?
- umeshunni 3y agoThey're going after both companies for discrimination on the basis of national origin.
- PabloRobles 3y agoSpaceX works on (potentially) military techologies covered by ITAR protection.
- TMWNN 3y ago... which makes the DoJ going after SpaceX for allegedly not hiring refugees/non-citizens all the stranger.
- staringback 3y agoWell, they are seemingly allow to hire permanent residents and are not restricted to citizens only. If there was a citizen only requirement this would be a non issue. You aren't allowed to exclude somebody who would otherwise be eligible because their work permit has an expiry date
- FireBeyond 3y agoBecause those people were able to legally do some of those jobs, but SpaceX chose not to consider them because it would be more administration/bureaucracy for SpaceX. Ergo, discriminating on the basis of their status. It was the same with disabilities, leading to the creation of the ADA. Companies would argue that they shouldn't have to hire someone in a wheelchair because it would cost them money to build wheelchair ramps and other accessibility aids.
- bubblethink 3y agoThe reality is that the regulations and restrictions in the other direction are much more severe. It's not that SpaceX cares about whom they hire; they'd hire anyone competent. The gov. will come down hard on export control and other issues if SpaceX slips up. So SpaceX essentially said fck it, just be a citizen or LPR. And this is more a sign of exasperation than anything else.
- avereveard 3y agothere's no contraddiction there, discrimination is bad both ways
- jkaplowitz 3y agoBoth are illegal in most circumstances, so yes.
- randyrand 3y agogotta toe the line! or just hire more robots, much easier.
- okwubodu 3y agoNot the opposite. The full group referenced here is “US citizens and certain non-US citizens whose permission to live in and work in the United States does not expire," and they went after SpaceX for discrimination against the latter (refugees and asylees, specifically).
- paulddraper 3y agoSame in the sense of "discrimination" Opposite in the sense of the direction of the discrimination.
- trident5000 3y ago[flagged]
- slater 3y agoRiiiight. Yeah, that must be it. No other possible reason whatsoever.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- trident5000 3y agoOf course thats it. Are you this naive? By the way a judge blocked it.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]