4 ms·
To preface, I largely agree with the end state presented here -- we use LLMs within a state machine-esque control flow in our product. It's great. With that sa
by jumploops 3y ago
To preface, I largely agree with the end state presented here -- we use LLMs within a state machine-esque control flow in our product. It's great.
With that said, I disagree with the sentiment of the author. If you're a developer who's only used the ChatGPT web UI, you should 100% play with and create "AI wrapper" tech. It's not until you find the limits of the best models that you start to see how and where LLMs can be used within a traditional software stack.
Even the author's company seems to have followed this path, first building an LLM-based prototype that "sort of" worked to convert Figma -> code, and then discovering all the gaps in the process.
Therefore, my advice is to try and build your "AI-based trading card grading system" (or w/e your heart desires) with e.g. GPT-4-Vision and then figure out how to make the product actually work as a product (just like builder.io).