3 ms·
I don't doubt that. I myself use it but the major problem that seems to remain unsolved for a while is that LLMs can't be blindly relied upon because they don't
by wg0 3y ago
I don't doubt that. I myself use it but the major problem that seems to remain unsolved for a while is that LLMs can't be blindly relied upon because they don't have any knowledge rather they mimic what knowledge might look like.
I find LLMs so much useful for myself because in some areas, I have developed expertise and even with a wrong LLM output, I can manually make few tweaks to make it work.
But same can't be said for an LLM bot meant for SAP or Netsuite that it'll guide a user reliably to a correct answer.
There you still need a real expert that's going to be way way slower than an LLM but with way way more higher accuracy rate in ballpark of 98.9% or above.
And that's where LLM with your own toolchain or rented toolchain doesn't make much sense. For many use cases. Yet.
- visarga 3y agoI would generalize that as "no LLM can surpass domain experts on any task, yet" The only superhuman AIs are very narrow, done by OpenAI - AlphaZero and AlphaFold, and they don't train on language