4 ms·
That is exactly what is needed. The B-2 is too big, too expensive, and too few. The B-21, two thirds the size, is much more useful for modern warfare. The US is
by ianburrell 3y ago
That is exactly what is needed. The B-2 is too big, too expensive, and too few. The B-21, two thirds the size, is much more useful for modern warfare. The US is planning on buying 100 of them instead of the 21 B-2, and replace the B-2s, B-1s, and maybe the B-52s.
The B-21 has the same range as B-2, it is the B-2 that is shorter range than B-52. Smaller bomber is much more flexible. Most missions don't require B-2 or B-52 size when carrying a few cruise missiles or guided bombs. If do need more, than can send two of them and those are available.
- hondo77 3y ago> The US is planning on buying 100 of them instead of the 21 B-2... The Air Force wanted to buy over 100 B-2 but Congress said "no". We'll see what happens this round.