It's murky whether the outputs of OpenAI's models can be copyrighted at all. Further, even the model weights, if released or leaked, might not qualify. Even '

It's murky whether the outputs of OpenAI's models can be copyrighted at all. Further, even the model weights, if released or leaked, might not qualify. Even 'steal' isn't quite the right word for the allegation of the malum prohibitum 'crime' of 'intellectual property infringement'. That's especially so if the disliked use isn't a reproduction as described in current law. You might have a better case trying to extend the fuzzier concept of 'moral rights'. The distaste for the training, without it crossing the specific lines in copyright law, more closely resembles that vague form of IP. But hey, you have in fact offered a sort of emotionally-rooted argument, albeit unconvincing, rather than the grandparent's unargued mere conclusory opinion that no valid contrary arguments exist.