4 ms·
That's fine but as long as it is connected to a network you cannot prove a system to be log-free. The majority of systems I've worked on used a message queue o
by elif 3y ago
That's fine but as long as it is connected to a network you cannot prove a system to be log-free.
The majority of systems I've worked on used a message queue of some kind for logging rather than a file on disk.
I suppose it could be useful to expedite downtime in the case that they are subpoenaed, but I doubt claiming to be diskless would prevent any subpoena.
- bragr 3y agoWith this kind of security, you're more guarding against your servers being seized or intelligence agency installing an implant. > I doubt claiming to be diskless would prevent any subpoena It does in Sweden. They've repeatedly squashed subpoenas > long as it is connected to a network you cannot prove a system to be log-free. Nothing is perfect. If you read their audits, it's clear admins could get at your traffic if they wanted
- ThePowerOfFuet 3y agoThis is why they have their architecture audited (and release the audit reports). https://mullvad.net/en/blog/2022/6/22/vpn-server-audit-found-no-information-leakage-or-logging-of-customer-data/ https://mullvad.net/en/blog/2022/6/22/vpn-server-audit-found...
- ziddoap 3y ago>but I doubt claiming to be diskless would prevent any subpoena. It has already. See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38220769 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38220769