3 ms·
How is this a valid argument? One's enemies don't get to choose how they receive coins. Even if an L2 exists, one can still send via a classic L1.
by not_really 3y ago
How is this a valid argument? One's enemies don't get to choose how they receive coins. Even if an L2 exists, one can still send via a classic L1.
- kemotep 3y agoThis fictional scenario would have people not sharing their L1 address. Like you currently don’t share your bank account number when you use a credit card. I’m highlighting how cryptocurrency would probably not be adopted as it works today and would likely have guardrails to prevent fraud, abuse, and a block list of “bad addresses” associated with transactions the government and corporate do not approve of. Like how fiat works today. It’s on cryptocurrency advocates to explain how mass adoption would avoid bad governance. And if we can eliminate bad governance by developing strong legal protections, rights to privacy and so on, why is the transition to crypto necessary if you had a right to freely, privately, and securely make digital transactions?