Using more resources than you provide is not a good indicator that the earth would be better off without you. This accounting strikes me as, let’s say, “unchar

Using more resources than you provide is not a good indicator that the earth would be better off without you. This accounting strikes me as, let’s say, “uncharitable”. Hitler was bad for human society even if he pooped enriched uranium every 5 minutes. There are people who provide no resources whatsoever who make the Earth way, way better. Thinking about a human life’s value in terms of “resources in/resources out” suggests to me that you have little understanding of the true value of humans and human culture.