2 ms·
I think that when read in its full context, it's really just to contrast with the other group, which is the masses to explain why "production and distribution o
by freedomben 3y ago
I think that when read in its full context, it's really just to contrast with the other group, which is the masses to explain why "production and distribution of commodities is entirely unorganized so that everybody must live in fear of being eliminated from the economic cycle, in this way suffering for the want of everything".
If I were to rephrase it, I would say society works democratically, but unfortunately the masses are much dumber than the real contributors to our society, but because their votes count the same as anyone else, the choices of the masses win elections and make bad choices. This is why there is such food and shelter insecurity.
- czl 3y agounfortunately the masses are much dumber > the real contributors to our society, but because their votes count the same as anyone else, the choices of the masses win elections and make bad choices Their "political votes" appear to count the same but if society rewards them then their economic power gives them outsized "economic votes". Every dollar spent is a vote for the service or product it is spent on.