4 ms·
I always got the impression it was actually quite neutral. One day the employee was gone due to an unexpected external force. Neither the employee's nor employe
by slyall 3y ago
I always got the impression it was actually quite neutral. One day the employee was gone due to an unexpected external force. Neither the employee's nor employer's fault.
It is a lot less neutral to say an employee was "fired" or "quit"
- oxygen_crisis 3y agoIt's distastefully ghoulish and trivializes the trauma of people who have lost loved ones to vehicle accidents. For anyone who hasn't led a wonderfully sheltered life that lets them conceptualize the situation as if it were something out of a "Looney Tunes" cartoon, it's going to evoke imagery of pools of blood and viscera on asphalt. Not the kind of mentality you'd usually expect from an HR department.
- cultureswitch 3y agoStill more humane than "terminated"