3 ms·
> For example, I cannot give up MS Entity Framework Core or Hot Chocolate graphql server for C#. What? Why? Also, what do you mean nothing is as feature comple
by dimgl 3y ago
> For example, I cannot give up MS Entity Framework Core or Hot Chocolate graphql server for C#.
What? Why? Also, what do you mean nothing is as feature complete as Entity Framework? What about ActiveRecord, Ecto, Django ORM, Knex, even Dapper in C# itself......
- cheema33 3y agoDo these replacements for Entity Framework Core offer first class support for Migrations, or temporal tables... Many of EF Core replacements do a handful of things well. And after that, it is a cliff. And now point me to a graphql server that is as feature rich and performant as Hot Chocolate. Simpler applications will not have complex needs that require feature rich libraries. But, beyond a certain level of complexity, you are on your own. And large orgs do create their own tooling and libraries. But, smaller orgs probably should stick to languages that offer large number of libraries to handle a vast number of problems. Anything else would be putting yourself at a competitive disadvantage.