3 ms·
I mean, maybe? The absolute largest obstacle any of these examples will have to overcome, though, is all of the amazing stuff that was done in the past. And a
by taeric 3y ago
I mean, maybe? The absolute largest obstacle any of these examples will have to overcome, though, is all of the amazing stuff that was done in the past. And all of the amazing things that are done today with long feedback loops.
Like, I get it. This seems to be a low hanging fruit that you should consider. But it seems somewhat likely that you will draw the line below stenography. We don't even teach shorthand to people anymore, and that would fall into all of these arguments, as well.
- yipbub 3y agoThe amazing stuff often has certain level of challenge, excitement, and reward behind it that compensates for the long feedback loops. It's not necessary for sure, but it sure is nice!
- taeric 3y agoRight. My assertion would be that, if you internalize the work, you can do far more mentally than you can physically. As such, if you can work a lot of the exploration and experimentation mentally, you can't beat that feedback loop. Now, integrity of signal is obviously a problem there. If you have a problem in your mental execution, you are likely to miss it. So, you do have to do some physical experimentation. But, for prose and the like, you don't have to type as you think.