I'm guessing these family farms don't count as parts of the States they're parts of for the purposes of this article. Which makes it wildly misleading and prop

I'm guessing these family farms don't count as parts of the States they're parts of for the purposes of this article. Which makes it wildly misleading and propagandistic. Those families are selling the products to someone who is paying them. Do those purchasers count as users of this water also? I can understand complaints that they have anticompetitive ancient water rights that should be renegotiated, that the river is being over depleted and their use of it is a heavy contributor, but to single them out as 1) not part of the states, 2) not doing it on behalf of other people for a paycheck, that's disingenuous.