Suppose that was the only information they had about their own servers being compromised. That would seem to land in a bit of a grey area, no? You're probably

Suppose that was the only information they had about their own servers being compromised. That would seem to land in a bit of a grey area, no? You're probably right and the courts could find some way around this shield if someone was too obviously negligent, though. Anyhow, that aside, my primary opposition comes from the fact that this is a poorly-drafted, unnecessary bill, not from how well I can imagine ways to abuse it. I mean, I don't think it's the end of civil liberties online or whatever its being billed as in the articles I haven't even read, but it's worth opposing simply for being such a crude blunt instrument.