I see, your point was more a technicality on the legal reason for the charge. I think the GPs point was not what the charge was, but the reason the person was

I see, your point was more a technicality on the legal reason for the charge. I think the GPs point was not what the charge was, but the reason the person was charged in the first place. Technically the charge may have been harassment, but in reality it was gender politics reasons - it's unlikely a harassment charge would have been laid if the accuser were not a trans person here. The reason this was highlighted was the concept of how other digital laws could be abused in a similar manner.