5 ms·
Thanks for sharing with me. The first two are pre trump, I don't remember them back then but they're well written compared to the articles I usually see shared
by graphe 3y ago
Thanks for sharing with me. The first two are pre trump, I don't remember them back then but they're well written compared to the articles I usually see shared from it, however the last one has nothing to do with women and is from 2019, it's not something I'd look for on the site. The first one seems like a retraction for was the gang rape real, and I'll admit the articles are better written but they don't go anywhere. I could have skipped most of the article for the information it gave me.
How did you use the site? I used to read Lifehacker looking up stuff until around 2009 but gawker was bad way before it became clickbait farms.
- giraffe_lady 3y agoI don't want to make it out like I'm a huge fan of the site or something. I originally followed it on google reader back in the day, and skipped most of the articles without reading even then. But they've also always had at least some truly excellent writers doing good work there.
- graphe 3y agoI edited my response and although the articles are better written I didn't get any insight from them. The first is a retraction to their other bad article, and the 2nd was a nice story about following a reporter and the 3rd one could have been summed up as they want to make Christian movies more diverse and include nonwhite and less rigid stories. The Unabomber predicted the futures today in the 90s. I hope we can agree that one person had more insight than the whole jezebel publication.
- giraffe_lady 3y agoWe absolutely do not agree about the positive impact of the unabomber, no.
- kergonath 3y agoThey did not mention any positive impact…