3 ms·
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425828/ Use of GPT-4 to Analyze Medical Records of Patien
by famouswaffles 3y ago
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425828/
Use of GPT-4 to Analyze Medical Records of Patients With Extensive Investigations and Delayed Diagnosis
"Six patients 65 years or older (2 women and 4 men) were included in the analysis. The accuracy of the primary diagnoses made by GPT-4, clinicians, and Isabel DDx Companion was 4 of 6 patients (66.7%), 2 of 6 patients (33.3%), and 0 patients, respectively. If including differential diagnoses, the accuracy was 5 of 6 (83.3%) for GPT-4, 3 of 6 (50.0%) for clinicians, and 2 of 6 (33.3%) for Isabel DDx Companion"
- gumballindie 3y agoAh yes, a study made on six patients. Very science, fits the pattern. But this alone invalidates the paper: “AI relies on clinical imaging.1 In low-income countries, where specialist care may be lacking” Have they been to a british hospital recently? Specialist care scarcity is fast approaching that of low income countries. The only option left is the poor man’s choice - chatbots.
- famouswaffles 3y ago>Ah yes, a study made on six patients. Very science, fits the pattern. Still a highly non trivial result. >But this alone invalidates the paper: “AI relies on clinical imaging.1 In low-income countries, where specialist care may be lacking” How does that invalidate the paper ?
- nullindividual 3y agoThat's great the bot can tell you that you have cancer, congrats. It isn't human, can't comfort the cancer patient, can't actually _help_ the cancer patient in any meaningful way to solve their issue. AI is not intelligence. It lacks empathy. It lacks just about everything a doctor does except regurgitate diagnosis based on data -- data gathered by doctors.