3 ms·
> Full transparency #2: I used ChatGPT to help me write this article. This disclaimer wasn't necessary, it was very obvious.
by rideontime 3y ago
> Full transparency #2: I used ChatGPT to help me write this article.
This disclaimer wasn't necessary, it was very obvious.
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 3y agoI swear I must be awful at reading voice. There's nothing that makes it even remotely obvious to me other than the certainty that an AI-detection AI would have detected it as AI-written. Are there any passages you can point to and explain how you observe it as ChatGPT-written?
- sdwr 3y agoI wouldn't have noticed without the disclaimer, but it's quite poorly written, in a glossy, vapid sense. It bounces between personal comments and sweeping, overwrought generalizations. > This is the democratization of design at its core – a shift from an exclusive club of skilled builders to a universal playground where anyone with a passion for LEGO can partake in the creation process. In this vein, the intersection of AI and LEGO is not just a meeting of technology and toy but a union of futures and pasts, of pixels and plastic – a synergy that promises to craft not just models, but bridges between ages, cultures, and the myriad dimensions of human creativity is just a polished turd of a paragraph
- rideontime 3y agoI don't have time to go back now, but the sibling's "polished turd" comment is perfect. Extremely verbose phrasing that says nothing of substance.
- nicbou 3y agoBrevity is the soul of wit, and ChatGPT struggles with it. GPT-written texts tend to read like a verbose average of everything it was trained on. If you've come across a lot of SEO filler text, it reads exactly the same.