3 ms·
Not even close. You can look at the Llama v2 training curves and its clear that even 7B models are still under-trained and they themselves have only been traine
by kaibee 3y ago
Not even close. You can look at the Llama v2 training curves and its clear that even 7B models are still under-trained and they themselves have only been trained on 2T tokens. A 70B or whatever size/model amalgamation GPT-4 is also likely under-trained.
Apart from just plain under-training, there's that whole 'grokking' phenomenon that's been observed in smaller models, where it looks like they're not really improving for a long time, but _eventually_ suddenly undergo a massive improvement. I don't know if anyone has been willing to set enough cash on fire to see if grokking can happen in a large LLM and/or how long it would need to be trained for.
There's also still a lot of juice left in improving the quality of datasets and in training on larger data sets. OpenAI, having built GPT-4, probably want to work on some applications of it given that they have enough of a lead on everyone else. I think there's definitely a few "burn piles of cash to train a better model" buttons at OpenAI right now, but they have no reason to use them when they're clearly in the lead anyway.
There's also the actual limiting factor: there are only so many A100s/H100s in the world, but the amount is growing.
- Suneel478 3y agoYeah, even RL tuning can be applied to improve reasoning paths for specialized applications, something like RLAIF by anthropic but for specialized agents