3 ms·
HR and applications are already fucking awful. and I don't care if large corps with automated ATS systems are mildly inconvenienced. Statistically, most peopl
by red-iron-pine 3y ago
HR and applications are already fucking awful.
and I don't care if large corps with automated ATS systems are mildly inconvenienced.
Statistically, most people weren't getting hired anyway with standard, non-AI ATS systems + the Mk1 Human Eyeball.
And of the hires, if you define successful hire as 2+ years in the role, most new hires fail at a rate between 50-80%[1]. Clearly not having AI is a failure. It might create tons of spam, but there is already a ton of spam, and it's miserable for everyone.
[1] https://itworkforce.intersog.com/blog/why-do-50-percent-of-all-new-hires-fail-and-how-to-prevent-it.html https://itworkforce.intersog.com/blog/why-do-50-percent-of-a...
- JohnFen 3y ago> I don't care if large corps with automated ATS systems are mildly inconvenienced. Neither do I. However, this use of AI harms more than just them -- it harms all other job-seekers as well. It looks to me like doing this just accelerates the race to the bottom for all.