5 ms·
I get caught off guard when people use "physical locks aren't actually that secure because the government can just make it irrelevant, but encryption is dangero
by seanw444 3y ago
I get caught off guard when people use "physical locks aren't actually that secure because the government can just make it irrelevant, but encryption is dangerously strong" as an argument against encryption, when it should be a tell about how terrifying your government is.
- _Algernon_ 3y agoI'm not arguing against encryption. Access to encryption is a generally a good thing. I'm arguing against a specific comparison being made between physical locks and encryption which is ridiculous on many levels, one of which I highlighted in my previous comment. Broad access to secure encryption is necessary in a free society.
- seanw444 3y agoI wasn't necessarily saying you were making that claim. Just in general.