2 ms·
> unless you are just trying to stop everyone else from ever submitting job applications Sure. Less of them means more success for me. Or for my people, i.e.
by red-iron-pine 3y ago
> unless you are just trying to stop everyone else from ever submitting job applications
Sure. Less of them means more success for me. Or for my people, i.e. we here at Stanford hoard it in order to ensure the success of Stanford grads.
In principle I'm alright with the idea -- force people to limit themselves to 25 applications, stuff you really want, keep down the noise -- but what happens if people don't get a bite at 25? what are you forcing the hiring orgs to do?
- rglullis 3y ago> Less of them means more success for me. No, less of them means that recruiters will not receive any applications in that channel. If recruiters stop caring about that channel, there is nothing stopping them from using or even creating a different one.