> Or perhaps they will be more transparent and simply have all conversations that involve someone that is likely in the UK encrypted for two recipients, one bei

> Or perhaps they will be more transparent and simply have all conversations that involve someone that is likely in the UK encrypted for two recipients, one being UK intel. That's certainly the way it would be implemented — an additional invisible member in every chat, which I've seen openly proposed. There's no way it would be transparent to the users, though. You'd simply have to be tech-savvy enough and well-informed enough to understand implicitly that this is the case.