This is an excellent idea, but it feels like an obvious application of RAGs (or a trivial agent to build with OpenAI’s latest ‘GPTs’ tool). Not dismissing the n

This is an excellent idea, but it feels like an obvious application of RAGs (or a trivial agent to build with OpenAI’s latest ‘GPTs’ tool). Not dismissing the necessary and valuable work—it’s “obvious” in the way sleeping after a long day is obvious. What I’d love to see is such an agent *learn* from the interactions with people asking: * What questions they ask more often than other framework, and how can the documentation clarify that (explicitly or not); * Can you detect when questions betray a naive grasp of the problem and when the person asking would benefit from dedicated training, not just a quick answer; * Can an LLM structure programming concepts and suggest ways to describe a framework that would help people make sense of what each framework actually is?