3 ms·
Why can you not have both privacy and safety? The notion of privacy isn’t mutually exclusive with finding criminals. Generally, we accept that criminals don’t d
by 4death4 3y ago
Why can you not have both privacy and safety? The notion of privacy isn’t mutually exclusive with finding criminals. Generally, we accept that criminals don’t deserve privacy. Historically, that’s meant that investigators have needed to show someone is likely a criminal before invading their privacy. What’s wrong with that model? Why do we need to change it now?
- cassianoleal 3y ago> You cannot have both: privacy and safety, and lawful access for the government. Pretty sure GP was putting "privacy and safety" together on one side vs "lawful access for the government" on the other.
- s1artibartfast 3y agoI think that it is the best model, but it does require trading some safety for privacy. The argument goes that police and investigators could intervene faster and stop more criminals if they were not encumbered by probable cause. Hence, privacy and safety are a tradeoff.